glueckkanja vs SentinelOne: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and SentinelOne (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while SentinelOne requires its own security platform. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SentinelOne focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 3 for SentinelOne (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs SentinelOne: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need SaaS and Network and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose SentinelOne if:
- •Organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting $1M breach response warranty as financial backstop
- •Organizations valuing AI-first detection with Purple AI and Google Threat Intelligence integration
- •Breach warranty matters to you (SentinelOne offers one, glueckkanja does not)
Bottom line: glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and SentinelOne (EDR vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners or SentinelOne's platform-native mdr for sentinelone customers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and SentinelOne?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SentinelOne is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: glueckkanja offers Not disclosed, SentinelOne offers ≤1 hour. glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SentinelOne.
How do glueckkanja and SentinelOne differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SentinelOne supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with glueckkanja and not included with SentinelOne.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to SentinelOne?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. SentinelOne pricing: MDR add-on: ~$17-35/endpoint/year (standard) or ~$35-50/endpoint/year (Pro/Elite). Total: ~$197-280/endpoint/year for platform + MDR. Example: 1,000 endpoints x $35 MDR x 5 years = ~$175K MDR add-on cost.. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with SentinelOne: Platform license ($69.99-$229.99/endpoint/year) is required BEFORE MDR — significant prerequisite cost; MDR pricing is a bolt-on fee separate from platform licensing — not shown on public pricing page.
Should I choose glueckkanja or SentinelOne?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose SentinelOne if: organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. SentinelOne is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or any non-SentinelOne EDR — platform-native lock-in.