glueckkanja vs Secureworks: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Secureworks (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while Secureworks works with your existing tools. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Secureworks focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 4 for Secureworks (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs Secureworks: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need SaaS and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose Secureworks if:
- •Organizations valuing deep threat intelligence (CTU now part of Sophos X-Ops, still actively publishing)
- •Companies needing OT/ICS MDR coverage (Dragos, Claroty, Nozomi, SCADAfence integrations)
- •Financial services organizations needing FFIEC-examined technology service provider
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Secureworks is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and Secureworks?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Secureworks is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: glueckkanja offers Not disclosed, Secureworks offers ≤1 hour. glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Secureworks.
How do glueckkanja and Secureworks differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Secureworks supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to Secureworks?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Secureworks pricing: PeerSpot community reports: ~$60K-$320K+/year depending on environment. One user: initial $160-170/endpoint negotiated to $110/endpoint. Another: ~$70 USD/agent/year with volume discounts. Available on AWS and Azure Marketplaces.. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with Secureworks: Sophos acquisition completed Feb 2025 — Taegis integration into Sophos Central underway, long-term platform consolidation likely; ~6% workforce reduction (~380 roles) in Feb 2025 post-acquisition — analyst continuity should be verified.
Should I choose glueckkanja or Secureworks?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose Secureworks if: enterprise organizations wanting open XDR with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne, or Carbon Black EDR investments. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. Secureworks is not ideal for enterprise organizations concerned about Sophos's SMB/mid-market heritage and whether Taegis enterprise investment continues.