glueckkanja vs ReliaQuest: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and ReliaQuest (Pure-play MDR) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while ReliaQuest works with your existing tools. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ReliaQuest focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs ReliaQuest: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
Choose ReliaQuest if:
- •Large enterprises with complex multi-vendor security stacks
- •Organizations wanting to keep existing SIEM/EDR investments
- •Security teams needing AI-driven automation at scale
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. ReliaQuest is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and ReliaQuest?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ReliaQuest is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: glueckkanja offers Not disclosed, ReliaQuest offers ≤15 minutes.
How do glueckkanja and ReliaQuest differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ReliaQuest supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to ReliaQuest?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. ReliaQuest pricing: $172,500 average annual; up to $1,200,000 for large deployments. $5,000 per additional integrated technology.. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with ReliaQuest: High minimum contract value (enterprise-focused); Additional technology integrations add cost quickly.
Should I choose glueckkanja or ReliaQuest?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose ReliaQuest if: large enterprises with complex multi-vendor security stacks. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. ReliaQuest is not ideal for sMBs with limited security budgets.