glueckkanja vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while Huntress requires its own security platform. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need Cloud and Network and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Huntress (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners or Huntress's the msp community's gold standard for smb-focused mdr.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and Huntress?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do glueckkanja and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with glueckkanja and not included with Huntress.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to Huntress?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose glueckkanja or Huntress?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.