Field Effect vs InfoGuard
Field Effect is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Field Effect targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Field Effect is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Field Effect targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Field Effect is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. InfoGuard is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable MDR with published per-user pricing | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | MDR Core: $3-$20/user/mo | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable MDR with published per-user pricing
- Price
- MDR Core: $3-$20/user/mo
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Field EffectPLATFORM | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Field Effect Agent (proprietary, required)Carbon Black (enrichment)Palo Alto Cortex XDR (enrichment)Cisco Meraki (enrichment)Zscaler (enrichment)Thinkst Canary (enrichment) | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Syslog ingestion supported | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | MDR Core: $3-$20/user/month (volume discounts apply). MDR Complete: custom pricing. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user, per-month | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MDR Core excludes network monitoring, DNS firewall, and dark web monitoring. Exact MDR Core price depends on volume and discounting within the published range. Requires proprietary Field Effect agent, cannot use existing EDR | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Hours to days for most customers | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesGovernmentDefense ContractorsMSP/MSSP Channel | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | 11 minutes overall MTTD, first detection in 2 minutes (MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Managed Services Round 2, 2024) | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | PeerSpot 9.2/10 (Jan 2026). SoftwareReviews 9.5/10 composite (423 verified reviews, +98 Net Emotional Footprint, Data Quadrant Leader four consecutive years 2022-2025). G2 Highest ROI in MDR, Winter 2026. Praised for easy setup, noise reduction, and MSP value. Main criticisms: limited third-party integrations and no raw log visibility. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PIPEDA | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Microsoft Virus Initiative (MVI) | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2016 | 2001 |
| Data retention | 90 days included, extended options available as upgrade | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Field Effect and InfoGuard?
Field Effect is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Field Effect and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
Field Effect supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Field Effect and included with InfoGuard.
How does Field Effect pricing compare to InfoGuard?
Field Effect pricing: MDR Core: $3-$20/user/month (volume discounts apply). MDR Complete: custom pricing.. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with Field Effect: MDR Core excludes network monitoring, DNS firewall, and dark web monitoring; Exact MDR Core price depends on volume and discounting within the published range. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose Field Effect or InfoGuard?
Choose Field Effect if: sMBs and MSPs wanting affordable MDR with published per-user pricing. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Field Effect is not ideal for organizations with existing CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender deployments (requires proprietary agent). InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.