ESET vs glueckkanja: MDR Comparison 2026
ESET (EDR vendor) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) take different approaches to managed detection and response. ESET requires its own security platform, while glueckkanja requires its own security platform. ESET targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; glueckkanja focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. ESET includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for glueckkanja (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
ESET vs glueckkanja: Which Should You Choose?
Choose ESET if:
- •SMBs with 25-500 devices needing enterprise-grade MDR
- •Organizations already using ESET endpoint protection
- •Companies needing multi-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android)
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: ESET (EDR vendor) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ESET's strong smb-focused mdr built on 30+ years of threat research, with fast 20-minute response times ... or glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between ESET and glueckkanja?
ESET is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: ESET offers ≤15 minutes, glueckkanja offers Not disclosed. ESET covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for glueckkanja.
How do ESET and glueckkanja differ in response capabilities?
ESET supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does ESET pricing compare to glueckkanja?
ESET pricing: Custom-quoted based on environment and device count; volume discounts available (25-seat minimum). glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with ESET: Requires ESET PROTECT Enterprise or Elite subscription as base; MDR Ultimate is a significant step up in price from standard MDR. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing.
Should I choose ESET or glueckkanja?
Choose ESET if: sMBs with 25-500 devices needing enterprise-grade MDR. Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. ESET is not ideal for enterprises requiring vendor-agnostic SIEM/EDR integration. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence.