eSentire vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
eSentire (Pure-play MDR) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. eSentire works with your existing tools, while Huntress requires its own security platform. eSentire targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. eSentire includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
eSentire vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose eSentire if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations needing active remediation, not just alerts
- •Critical infrastructure sectors
- •Organizations with complex multi-vendor security stacks requiring 300+ integrations
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. eSentire is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between eSentire and Huntress?
eSentire is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: eSentire offers ≤15 minutes, Huntress offers Not disclosed. eSentire covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do eSentire and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
eSentire supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with eSentire and not included with Huntress.
How does eSentire pricing compare to Huntress?
eSentire pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with eSentire: Tier differences significant — Essentials may lack key response capabilities; BYOL pricing differs from bundled Atlas Agent pricing. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose eSentire or Huntress?
Choose eSentire if: mid-market and enterprise organizations needing active remediation, not just alerts. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. eSentire is not ideal for budget-constrained SMBs seeking the lowest-cost MDR option. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.