eSentire vs glueckkanja: MDR Comparison 2026
eSentire (Pure-play MDR) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) take different approaches to managed detection and response. eSentire works with your existing tools, while glueckkanja requires its own security platform. eSentire targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; glueckkanja focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. eSentire includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for glueckkanja (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
eSentire vs glueckkanja: Which Should You Choose?
Choose eSentire if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations needing active remediation, not just alerts
- •Critical infrastructure sectors
- •Organizations with complex multi-vendor security stacks requiring 300+ integrations
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. eSentire is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between eSentire and glueckkanja?
eSentire is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: eSentire offers ≤15 minutes, glueckkanja offers Not disclosed. eSentire covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for glueckkanja.
How do eSentire and glueckkanja differ in response capabilities?
eSentire supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does eSentire pricing compare to glueckkanja?
eSentire pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with eSentire: Tier differences significant — Essentials may lack key response capabilities; BYOL pricing differs from bundled Atlas Agent pricing. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing.
Should I choose eSentire or glueckkanja?
Choose eSentire if: mid-market and enterprise organizations needing active remediation, not just alerts. Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. eSentire is not ideal for budget-constrained SMBs seeking the lowest-cost MDR option. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence.