Ensign InfoSecurity vs Northwave
Ensign InfoSecurity and Northwave are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Northwave serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ensign InfoSecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Northwave (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Ensign InfoSecurity and Northwave are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Northwave serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Ensign InfoSecurity includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Northwave (Endpoint, Network).
Ensign InfoSecurity offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 2). Northwave may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC | Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Ensign InfoSecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | NorthwaveTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Cybereason | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage scope. IR retainer is separate: Essentials (USD 2,000/year, 10 hours), Standard (100-hour blocks), or Ad-hoc. | Custom quote. Northwave does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.. 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Pricing requires custom quote. No published per-endpoint or per-user rates for comparison shopping.. Cybereason EDR is the default platform. Unclear what the cost or support impact is if you use a different EDR vendor.. Ad-hoc IR retainer has no upfront cost but standard-priced manhours and longer onboarding. You pay more per hour in a crisis. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR.. Cloud, SaaS and identity coverage are not named as clearly as endpoint, log and network telemetry.. Detection tuning depends on onboarding log sources and threat-based use cases, which may affect deployment effort. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Northwave says implementation starts with a plan covering service elements, phases, planning and threat-based use cases, then onboarding log sources and processes. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingLogisticsTechnologyPublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250: top 10 globally and #1 in APAC for the fourth consecutive year (2025 list). No G2 or PeerSpot product reviews found. Glassdoor employee reviews average 3.4/5 (268 reviews). Industry recognition is strong within APAC, but almost zero practitioner discussion outside the region. | Northwave has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on European delivery, Utrecht SOC operations and the connection between MDR, CERT, red team and threat research. Buyers should validate response authority, cloud and identity coverage, pricing and escalation rules before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001PCI DSS | NIS2ISO 27001GDPRTISAX |
| Certifications | ISO 27001PCI DSSOSPAR (SOC attestation) | – |
| Founded | 2018 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Ensign InfoSecurity and Northwave?
Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Northwave is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Ensign InfoSecurity covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Northwave.
How do Ensign InfoSecurity and Northwave differ in response capabilities?
Ensign InfoSecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Northwave supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Ensign InfoSecurity pricing compare to Northwave?
Ensign InfoSecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Northwave pricing: Not published. Watch for with Ensign InfoSecurity: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.; 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Watch for with Northwave: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR..
Should I choose Ensign InfoSecurity or Northwave?
Choose Ensign InfoSecurity if: mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC. Choose Northwave if: benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC. Ensign InfoSecurity is not ideal for north American or European organizations without APAC operations. Northwave is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.