e2e-assure vs suresecure
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. suresecure is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; suresecure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. e2e-assure includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for suresecure ().
Buyer brief
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. suresecure is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; suresecure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. e2e-assure includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for suresecure ().
e2e-assure (Pure-play MDR) and suresecure (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize e2e-assure's uk-focused mdr with sc-cleared analysts and deep microsoft expertise, purpose-built for critical ... or suresecure's suresecure fits dach buyers that want a german services firm to run mdr and incident-response man....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts | DACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps |
| Price | AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear | EUR 7,999/mo for 2 months, up to 500 assets |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts
- Price
- AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- DACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps
- Price
- EUR 7,999/mo for 2 months, up to 500 assets
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | e2e-assureTECH-AGNOSTIC | suresecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOneTrend Micro Vision One CrowdStrike | Trend Micro CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel Splunk | Google Chronicle Splunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published. | Proof of Value: EUR 7,999/month plus VAT for 2 months, up to 500 assets. Ongoing MDR pricing is not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month pricing. Two tiers: Monitored (baseline Defender coverage, monthly reports) and Managed (extended functionality, automated threat responses, Teams-based monthly reviews). Contracts typically 12-36 months. Also available as committed annual contract with retrospective monthly management charge based on device count. | Custom quote for ongoing Managed SOC and MDR. suresecure publishes a fixed-price 2-month Managed SOC Proof of Value. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.. Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Minimum spend threshold exists but is not publicly disclosed. Ask for it before engaging.. OT/ICS and advanced cloud coverage may be priced as additional modules beyond base MDR.. Managed tier costs more than Monitored, with significantly different automation and analyst involvement. Clarify which tier is being quoted. | The published Proof of Value price applies only up to 500 connected assets and lasts 2 months.. Public pages do not publish ongoing MDR prices, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Exact response authority and automated action rights need written playbooks.. Google SecOps licensing, log ingestion and storage can affect the final bill.. Co-managed SOC is aimed at teams that already have SIEM expertise. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, 2-year, 3-year | Custom, Proof of Value |
| Channels | TeamsEmailPortalPhone | EmailPhonePortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Weeks, varies by integration complexity and environment scope | suresecure says most log sources can be connected within a few hours on the MDR page, the Managed SOC page says go-live can happen in 4 weeks and the Proof of Value sheet says onboarding takes a few days. Buyers should confirm scope by log source and response playbook. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical National InfrastructureManufacturingDefenseUtilitiesLife Sciences | ManufacturingHealthcareEnergyRetailProfessional ServicesSports and EntertainmentCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NPS score of 88+ (vendor-reported, industry average 34) suggests high customer satisfaction among existing clients. However, virtually no public reviews on G2, Gartner, or Reddit exist, making independent validation impossible. Customers appear to value SC clearance and UK/government compliance focus. Small enough provider that community discussion is minimal. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in G2, PeerSpot, Gartner Peer Insights or Reddit. The public buyer case rests on German SOC delivery, Google SecOps specialization, ISO 27001 status, named reference logos and a published Proof of Value offer, but buyers should validate pricing, response authority, analyst staffing and threat-hunting scope directly. |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials PlusG-Cloud 14CCS Framework | ISO 27001GDPRNIS2 |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials Plus | ISO 27001BSI-certified incident expertsGoogle Cloud Security PartnerISG Provider Lens Next-Gen SOC/MDR Services Midmarket Leader |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Data retention | Not published | No standard MDR retention period was found. The Co-Managed SOC page says normalized SIEM data is processed in suresecure's cloud-native SOC architecture but not stored there, with data sovereignty remaining with the customer. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between e2e-assure and suresecure?
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). suresecure is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: e2e-assure offers ≤1 hour, suresecure offers Not disclosed. e2e-assure covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for suresecure.
How do e2e-assure and suresecure differ in response capabilities?
e2e-assure supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. suresecure supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with e2e-assure and included with suresecure.
How does e2e-assure pricing compare to suresecure?
e2e-assure pricing: Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published.. suresecure pricing: Proof of Value: EUR 7,999/month plus VAT for 2 months, up to 500 assets. Ongoing MDR pricing is not published.. Watch for with e2e-assure: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.; Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Watch for with suresecure: The published Proof of Value price applies only up to 500 connected assets and lasts 2 months.; Public pages do not publish ongoing MDR prices, contract minimums or service-credit language..
Should I choose e2e-assure or suresecure?
Choose e2e-assure if: uK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts. Choose suresecure if: dACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps. e2e-assure is not ideal for organizations needing full hands-on remediation (e2e-assure automates containment but guides remediation). suresecure is not ideal for buyers that need public ongoing MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.