e2e-assure vs InfoGuard
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. e2e-assure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
e2e-assure (Pure-play MDR) and InfoGuard (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize e2e-assure's uk-focused mdr with sc-cleared analysts and deep microsoft expertise, purpose-built for critical ... or InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts
- Price
- AppSource from GBP 6/user/mo; min spend unclear
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | e2e-assureTECH-AGNOSTIC | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCrowdStrikeSentinelOneTrend Micro Vision One | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunk | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤1 hour | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month pricing. Two tiers: Monitored (baseline Defender coverage, monthly reports) and Managed (extended functionality, automated threat responses, Teams-based monthly reviews). Contracts typically 12-36 months. Also available as committed annual contract with retrospective monthly management charge based on device count. | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.. Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Minimum spend threshold exists but is not publicly disclosed. Ask for it before engaging.. OT/ICS and advanced cloud coverage may be priced as additional modules beyond base MDR.. Managed tier costs more than Monitored, with significantly different automation and analyst involvement. Clarify which tier is being quoted. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, 2-year, 3-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | TeamsEmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Weeks, varies by integration complexity and environment scope | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical National InfrastructureManufacturingDefenseUtilitiesLife Sciences | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NPS score of 88+ (vendor-reported, industry average 34) suggests high customer satisfaction among existing clients. However, virtually no public reviews on G2, Gartner, or Reddit exist, making independent validation impossible. Customers appear to value SC clearance and UK/government compliance focus. Small enough provider that community discussion is minimal. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials PlusG-Cloud 14CCS Framework | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001Cyber Essentials Plus | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2013 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not published | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between e2e-assure and InfoGuard?
e2e-assure is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: e2e-assure offers ≤1 hour, InfoGuard offers Not disclosed.
How do e2e-assure and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
e2e-assure supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with e2e-assure and included with InfoGuard.
How does e2e-assure pricing compare to InfoGuard?
e2e-assure pricing: Starting around £6/user/month (per Microsoft AppSource listing), dependent on user count, number of services, and subject to minimum spend. Specific minimums not published.. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with e2e-assure: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate retainer delivered through UK-based partners.; Automated containment triggers on critical alerts, but broader remediation is your team's responsibility. Budget for internal staff to act on SOC guidance.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose e2e-assure or InfoGuard?
Choose e2e-assure if: uK or Australian government and critical infrastructure organizations requiring SC-cleared analysts. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. e2e-assure is not ideal for organizations needing full hands-on remediation (e2e-assure automates containment but guides remediation). InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.