Deepwatch vs N-able: MDR Comparison 2026
Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and N-able (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Deepwatch works with your existing tools, while N-able works with your existing tools. Deepwatch targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; N-able focuses on SMB and Mid-market.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Deepwatch vs N-able: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Deepwatch if:
- •Mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments
- •Companies wanting a dedicated named team (Squad model) rather than rotating anonymous analysts
- •AWS-heavy environments leveraging Deepwatch's Level 1 MSSP Competency partnership
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose N-able if:
- •MSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA
- •SMBs and mid-market needing breach warranty protection
- •Organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with existing EDR
- •Breach warranty matters to you (N-able offers one, Deepwatch does not)
Bottom line: Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and N-able (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Deepwatch's siem-centric, vendor-agnostic mdr with a patented drs engine (98% fp reduction), dedicated squad ... or N-able's unified security operations platform combining xdr, siem, soar, and ueba with mdr in one solution.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Deepwatch and N-able?
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Deepwatch and N-able differ in response capabilities?
Deepwatch supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Deepwatch and included with N-able.
How does Deepwatch pricing compare to N-able?
Deepwatch pricing: Average ~$220K/year; maximum ~$315K for large deployments (per Vendr data). N-able pricing: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR. Watch for with Deepwatch: Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes; Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) — critical response capabilities may be gated behind higher tiers. Watch for with N-able: Pricing designed for MSP channel; direct pricing may differ; MDR Base is identity-focused only; Complete needed for full coverage.
Should I choose Deepwatch or N-able?
Choose Deepwatch if: mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments. Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA. Deepwatch is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — average $220K/year pricing is enterprise-oriented. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure.