Deepwatch vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Deepwatch works with your existing tools, while Huntress requires its own security platform. Deepwatch targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Deepwatch includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Deepwatch vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Deepwatch if:
- •Mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments
- •Companies wanting a dedicated named team (Squad model) rather than rotating anonymous analysts
- •AWS-heavy environments leveraging Deepwatch's Level 1 MSSP Competency partnership
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Deepwatch is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Deepwatch and Huntress?
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Deepwatch covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do Deepwatch and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
Deepwatch supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Deepwatch pricing compare to Huntress?
Deepwatch pricing: Average ~$220K/year; maximum ~$315K for large deployments (per Vendr data). Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with Deepwatch: Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes; Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) — critical response capabilities may be gated behind higher tiers. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose Deepwatch or Huntress?
Choose Deepwatch if: mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Deepwatch is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — average $220K/year pricing is enterprise-oriented. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.