Deepwatch vs glueckkanja: MDR Comparison 2026
Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Deepwatch works with your existing tools, while glueckkanja requires its own security platform. Deepwatch targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; glueckkanja focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Deepwatch includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for glueckkanja (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Deepwatch vs glueckkanja: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Deepwatch if:
- •Mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments
- •Companies wanting a dedicated named team (Squad model) rather than rotating anonymous analysts
- •AWS-heavy environments leveraging Deepwatch's Level 1 MSSP Competency partnership
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Deepwatch is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Deepwatch and glueckkanja?
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Deepwatch covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for glueckkanja.
How do Deepwatch and glueckkanja differ in response capabilities?
Deepwatch supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Deepwatch and included with glueckkanja.
How does Deepwatch pricing compare to glueckkanja?
Deepwatch pricing: Average ~$220K/year; maximum ~$315K for large deployments (per Vendr data). glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Deepwatch: Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes; Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) — critical response capabilities may be gated behind higher tiers. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing.
Should I choose Deepwatch or glueckkanja?
Choose Deepwatch if: mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments. Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Deepwatch is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — average $220K/year pricing is enterprise-oriented. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence.