DeepSeas vs InfoGuard
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
DeepSeas (Pure-play MDR) and InfoGuard (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DeepSeas's technology-agnostic mdr with ot/ics coverage, which is rare in this market or InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DeepSeasTECH-AGNOSTIC | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneCarbon Black | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkMicrosoft Sentinel | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage areas. No published pricing. 1-3 year contract terms. | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed. Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. OT/ICS coverage may require Nozomi Networks licensing and separate scoping. CyberFusion SOC (dedicated infrastructure) is a separate, premium offering beyond base MDR+ | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year (1-3 years) | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingEnergy & UtilitiesCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareTechnology | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Ranked #1 service-based MDR in the 2024 Frost Radar and listed in Gartner's top 40 MDR providers. Praised for OT/ICS coverage and working with existing tools. Very limited practitioner reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Most validation comes from analyst reports rather than user feedback. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | ISO 27001 (certified December 2024, audited by A-LIGN)Nozomi Networks MSSP Elite PartnerMicrosoft PartnerCrowdStrike Integration Partner | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2022 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not published | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DeepSeas and InfoGuard?
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do DeepSeas and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
DeepSeas supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with DeepSeas and included with InfoGuard.
How does DeepSeas pricing compare to InfoGuard?
DeepSeas pricing: Not published. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with DeepSeas: Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed; Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose DeepSeas or InfoGuard?
Choose DeepSeas if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. DeepSeas is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without pre-approved runbooks. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.