Cyrebro vs Kroll: MDR comparison 2026
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Kroll is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Kroll serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Cyrebro if:
- •SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- •Organizations that need fast onboarding (hours) and do not want to manage a SIEM themselves
- •MSPs looking for a white-label, multi-tenant SOC platform
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •You need Identity coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Cyrebro does not)
Bottom line: Cyrebro (Platform vendor) and Kroll (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals... or Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and Kroll?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kroll is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kroll.
How do Cyrebro and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to Kroll?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency, customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost, cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose Cyrebro or Kroll?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR with 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).