Cynet vs glueckkanja: MDR Comparison 2026
Cynet (MDR provider) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Cynet requires its own security platform, while glueckkanja requires its own security platform. Cynet targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; glueckkanja focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Cynet includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for glueckkanja (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Cynet vs glueckkanja: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cynet if:
- •SMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams (1-5 people) wanting maximum coverage from a single platform
- •Budget-conscious buyers wanting published transparent pricing with MDR included at no extra cost
- •Organizations that weight MITRE ATT&CK platform evaluation results heavily (100%/100%/0 FP for 3 consecutive rounds)
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: Cynet (MDR provider) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cynet's best fit for smb/mid-market teams wanting an all-in-one security platform with transparent pricin... or glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Cynet and glueckkanja?
Cynet is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Cynet covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for glueckkanja.
How do Cynet and glueckkanja differ in response capabilities?
Cynet supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Cynet and included with glueckkanja.
How does Cynet pricing compare to glueckkanja?
Cynet pricing: Elite: $7/endpoint/month (EPP+EDR+CyOps MDR). All-in-One: $10/endpoint/month (adds NDR, UEBA, Deception, SOAR, SSPM). Verified on cynet.com/packages. (20-seat minimum). glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Cynet: 20-endpoint minimum — $140/month floor for Elite, $200/month for All-in-One; 1-year auto-renewing contracts standard; combined with platform lock-in, exit is disruptive. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing.
Should I choose Cynet or glueckkanja?
Choose Cynet if: sMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams (1-5 people) wanting maximum coverage from a single platform. Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Cynet is not ideal for large enterprises with existing security stacks — Cynet requires replacing existing EDR with its own agent. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence.