Cyberoo vs InfoGuard
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyberoo includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyberoo includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Cyberoo (Pure-play MDR) and InfoGuard (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyberoo's technology-agnostic mdr from the only italian gartner representative vendor, built for european m... or InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Own agent required | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberooTECH-AGNOSTIC | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Technology-agnostic: integrates with most major EDR platforms | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Technology-agnostic: integrates with existing SIEM deployments | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and integrated tools. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. SaaS delivery. | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.. Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. International expansion is recent (Spain 2024, Poland via partners). Support quality outside Italy may vary.. Detection rules and threat intel are proprietary. If you leave, none of it transfers.. IR is described as included, but scope is not documented. Clarify whether it covers full DFIR or just triage and escalation. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingProfessional ServicesTechnologyHealthcareFinancial Services | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (25 reviews). Named Gartner Representative Vendor for MDR in 2021, 2023, and 2024, the only Italian company among 40 vendors in the 2024 guide. Strong reputation in Italian mid-market. Very limited English-language community discussion, likely due to European-centric customer base. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | GDPR | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | GDPR Compliant | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2019 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not published | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyberoo and InfoGuard?
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyberoo covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for InfoGuard.
How do Cyberoo and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
Cyberoo supports 4 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cyberoo pricing compare to InfoGuard?
Cyberoo pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyberoo: No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.; Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose Cyberoo or InfoGuard?
Choose Cyberoo if: european mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Cyberoo is not ideal for global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage outside Europe. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.