Cyberleaf vs Thales (S21sec)
Cyberleaf and Thales (S21sec) are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cyberleaf targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Thales (S21sec) serves Enterprise. Cyberleaf includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Thales (S21sec) (Network, OT/ICS).
Buyer brief
Cyberleaf and Thales (S21sec) are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cyberleaf targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Thales (S21sec) serves Enterprise. Cyberleaf includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Thales (S21sec) (Network, OT/ICS).
Cyberleaf offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 2). Thales (S21sec) may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Growing businesses with 50-500 employees that have IT staff but no internal SOC | Critical infrastructure and public-sector buyers that need Thales/S21sec regional cyber detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Growing businesses with 50-500 employees that have IT staff but no internal SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Critical infrastructure and public-sector buyers that need Thales/S21sec regional cyber detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberleafTECH-AGNOSTIC | Thales (S21sec)TECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | Customer endpoint security tools |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer SIEM platformsThales SOC tooling |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote. No public per-endpoint, per-user or package price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom monthly pricing based on environment size and service needs. MSP partner pricing is described as predictable per-client pricing. | Custom quote for Thales Cyber Detection and Response, Managed Security Services, SOC and MDR. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The website says managed cybersecurity includes proactive services, while the public service agreement excludes some advanced work unless separately contracted.. No public MDR-specific SLA table was found.. The public agreement references annual, 24-month and 36-month terms, with renewal terms and add-on ordering handled through the sales order.. Remote access, collectors, virtual machines or servers may be required to deliver service, and some access methods can add charges. | The current S21sec domain routes to Thales-branded services, so buyers wanting legacy S21sec-specific delivery should confirm contracting entity, SOC location and delivery team.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD/MTTR or formal MDR SLAs.. Thales offers a broad cybersecurity services portfolio; buyers should separate base MDR scope from CTI, DRPS, DFIR, CERT, ICS monitoring and advisory services.. Named endpoint, identity and cloud containment actions are not public and should be confirmed tool by tool.. Data retention, raw log access, offboarding and detection-content export rights are not described publicly. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, 24 months, 36 months, Custom | Custom cyber detection and response engagement, Managed Security Services, SOC and MDR, Critical-infrastructure cybersecurity services |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhonePortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | EuropeMEAAPAC |
| Onboarding | Most deployments are described as fully operational within weeks. Exact timeline depends on the customer environment and sales order. | Not published. Thales describes customer-centric service roadmaps and selecting/deploying detection and response technologies, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Defense Industrial BaseHealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnologySaaSPrivate EquityGovernment Contractors | Critical InfrastructureGovernmentDefenseEnergyManufacturingAviationSpaceFinancial ServicesTelecommunicationsHealthcareTransportationAutomotiveUtilitiesMaritime |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Cyberleaf has a clear current vendor story, public customer language and partner positioning, but little independent MDR review volume was found in this pass. The strongest evidence is vendor-controlled, so buyer validation should lean on references, a proof of value and careful review of the sales order. | The current public evidence is strong for Thales-branded global SOC, MDR, CTI, DFIR and critical-infrastructure detection and response, but weak for S21sec as a standalone public MDR brand. Buyers should validate current delivery model, SOC location, response authority, pricing and whether the contract is with Thales/S21sec in the relevant country. |
| Compliance | SOC 2CMMCNIST 800-171HIPAAPCI DSSISO 27001ITAR | DORATIBER-EUPCI DSSEASA Part-ISEASAICAOUNECE |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IICyberAB Registered Practitioner Organization | 8 threat intelligence and AI-driven SOCs around the worldSOCs in France, Morocco, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, Portugal and Spain, and New Zealand and Australia |
| Founded | 2010 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Cyberleaf says it indemnifies customers from license and data ingestion costs, but retention period and export terms were not found. | Not published. Public pages do not describe default log retention, raw log access, storage tiers or export terms for Thales SOC and MDR. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyberleaf and Thales (S21sec)?
Cyberleaf is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Thales (S21sec) is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyberleaf covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Thales (S21sec).
How do Cyberleaf and Thales (S21sec) differ in response capabilities?
Cyberleaf supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Thales (S21sec) supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Cyberleaf and included with Thales (S21sec).
How does Cyberleaf pricing compare to Thales (S21sec)?
Cyberleaf pricing: Custom quote. No public per-endpoint, per-user or package price found.. Thales (S21sec) pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyberleaf: The website says managed cybersecurity includes proactive services, while the public service agreement excludes some advanced work unless separately contracted.; No public MDR-specific SLA table was found.. Watch for with Thales (S21sec): The current S21sec domain routes to Thales-branded services, so buyers wanting legacy S21sec-specific delivery should confirm contracting entity, SOC location and delivery team.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD/MTTR or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose Cyberleaf or Thales (S21sec)?
Choose Cyberleaf if: growing businesses with 50-500 employees that have IT staff but no internal SOC. Choose Thales (S21sec) if: critical infrastructure and public-sector buyers that need Thales/S21sec regional cyber detection and response. Cyberleaf is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales. Thales (S21sec) is not ideal for buyers that need a standalone legacy S21sec-branded MDR package.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.