CrowdStrike vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
CrowdStrike (EDR vendor) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. CrowdStrike requires its own security platform, while Huntress requires its own security platform. CrowdStrike targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. CrowdStrike includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
CrowdStrike vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose CrowdStrike if:
- •Enterprise organizations (200+ endpoints) wanting MITRE-validated detection speed
- •Teams comfortable with a single-vendor platform approach
- •Organizations that want fully autonomous remediation without approval workflows
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (CrowdStrike offers one, Huntress does not)
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: CrowdStrike (EDR vendor) and Huntress (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CrowdStrike's top-tier detection speed and active remediation depth backed by mitre-validated metrics, crowdstr... or Huntress's the msp community's gold standard for smb-focused mdr.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between CrowdStrike and Huntress?
CrowdStrike is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). CrowdStrike covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do CrowdStrike and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
CrowdStrike supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and acts without approval. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with CrowdStrike and not included with Huntress.
How does CrowdStrike pricing compare to Huntress?
CrowdStrike pricing: $15-25/endpoint/month (estimates vary by deployment size) (200-seat minimum). Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with CrowdStrike: Minimum 200-500 endpoints required — eliminates most SMBs; Requires CrowdStrike Falcon platform — cannot use with competing EDR. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose CrowdStrike or Huntress?
Choose CrowdStrike if: enterprise organizations (200+ endpoints) wanting MITRE-validated detection speed. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. CrowdStrike is not ideal for sMBs with fewer than 200 endpoints (minimum requirement). Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.