Check Point vs InfoGuard
Check Point and InfoGuard are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Check Point and InfoGuard are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Check Point offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 4). InfoGuard may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Check PointTECH-AGNOSTIC | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Check Point Harmony Endpoint | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user subscription with one-year and multi-year plans. Three tiers: MDR (endpoint and API monitoring), MDR 360 (adds identity protection, expanded integrations, XDR/XPR access), MXDR 360 (adds managed SIEM and data lake). | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR. Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Identity protection and expanded integrations require the MDR 360 tier, not the base MDR tier. PeerSpot reviewers consistently flag Check Point licensing and support costs as higher than competitors | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | 1 year, Multi-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Integration via APIs and endpoint agents | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTelecommunicationsManufacturingCritical InfrastructureRetail | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | PeerSpot rates Check Point Infinity 8.8/10 (platform-level, not MDR-specific). Premium pricing, licensing complexity, and technical support delays are persistent complaints across PeerSpot reviews. MDR-specific community feedback is minimal. Most reviews cover the Infinity platform broadly, not the MDR service layer. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAPCI DSS | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 1993 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. MXDR 360 tier includes a data lake for long-term retention and compliance. | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Check Point and InfoGuard?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Check Point covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for InfoGuard.
How do Check Point and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Check Point pricing compare to InfoGuard?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors.. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with Check Point: ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR; Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose Check Point or InfoGuard?
Choose Check Point if: enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Check Point is not ideal for budget-conscious buyers or SMBs who need predictable, transparent pricing. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.