Capgemini vs Truesec
Capgemini and Truesec are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Truesec serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Truesec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini and Truesec are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Truesec serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Truesec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Truesec offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 3). Capgemini may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | TruesecTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOnePalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | CrowdStrike Falcon LogScaleSplunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Fixed fee per endpoint. No log volume or retention surcharges. No public pricing for any tier. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate. IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it. US customers may get a different experience since bulk of 350+ specialists are in Europe |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhoneTeamsSlack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | 72 hours for Core and Enterprise. Black tier not disclosed. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareEnergyCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Effectively unrateable. No public reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Not in Forrester Wave or Gartner MQ for MDR. No Reddit mentions. Strong Nordic reputation based on vendor claims and partner references (EY, Microsoft MISA), but impossible to validate through independent peer feedback. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001MISA (Microsoft Intelligent Security Association) |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001 |
| Founded | 1967 | 2005 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Included in fixed fee, no log volume or retention surcharges. Specific retention periods not disclosed. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Truesec?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Truesec is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Truesec.
How do Capgemini and Truesec differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Truesec supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Truesec.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Truesec?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Truesec pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Truesec: No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate; IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it.
Should I choose Capgemini or Truesec?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Truesec if: nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Truesec is not ideal for uS-based organizations wanting a fully staffed local SOC (bulk of specialists in Europe).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.