Capgemini vs Trend Micro
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Trend Micro is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Capgemini is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | Trend MicroPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Trend Micro |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | 251 |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Credit-based system under 12-month contract. Tiered pricing by user count (251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-2,000). Credits drawn down monthly. PAYG available for additional usage beyond credits. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses. Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective.. Extended data retention (beyond 30 days) costs extra, up to 365 days available. Credit model means unused credits expire at contract end unless moved to other Trend solutions |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual, PAYG |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Requires Vision One deployment before MDR onboarding. Specific timeline not published. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for 20 consecutive years in endpoint protection. Vision One rated 8.6/10 on PeerSpot, ranked #2 in XDR. MITRE ATT&CK 2024: 100% detection with 86% actionable rate. Praised for unified visibility and platform breadth. Criticized for requiring Trend platform commitment and pooled analyst model. |
| Compliance | DORA | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPHIPAAGDPR |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPGartner Magic Quadrant Leader (Endpoint Protection, 20 consecutive years)MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations participant (2024) |
| Founded | 1967 | 1988 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | 30 days default for raw data, up to 365 days with extended storage. Alert workbenches retained 180 days. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Trend Micro?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Trend Micro.
How do Capgemini and Trend Micro differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Trend Micro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Trend Micro.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Trend Micro?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Trend Micro pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. (251-seat minimum). Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Trend Micro: Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses; Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective..
Should I choose Capgemini or Trend Micro?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Trend Micro if: mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Trend Micro is not ideal for small businesses under 251 users (minimum requirement eliminates SMBs).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.