Capgemini vs Total Assure
Capgemini and Total Assure are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Total Assure serves SMB and Mid-market.
Buyer brief
Capgemini and Total Assure are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Total Assure serves SMB and Mid-market.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | SMBs that want an outsourced security team with U.S.-based 24/7 SOC coverage |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Own agent required |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs that want an outsourced security team with U.S.-based 24/7 SOC coverage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | Total AssureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | Splunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom flat-rate pricing. No public dollar amount found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Flat-rate monthly pricing is claimed publicly, with no per-user fees and no hidden charges. Total Assure does not publish actual monthly price bands, minimums or what changes the flat rate as employees and infrastructure scale. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Confirm exactly which services are inside the flat monthly MDR rate, especially email security, vulnerability management, digital forensics and recovery.. Confirm whether Splunk, SentinelOne, Avanan, Tenable or other third-party tool costs are included or passed through.. The site claims no per-user surprises, but buyers should ask how the flat rate changes as employees, endpoints, cloud workloads and log volume grow.. No public contractual MDR SLA table, service-credit language or breach warranty was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Monthly, Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Typical deployment reaches full 24/7 SOC protection by day 30 after discovery, deployment, configuration, tuning and baselining. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingProfessional ServicesEducationDefense Industrial Base |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Public buyer-review signal is thin. G2 shows 5.0/5 from one review, says there are not enough reviews to provide buying insight, and categorizes the review under managed security services and vulnerability assessment rather than MDR specifically. |
| Compliance | DORA | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAAISO 27001CMMCNIST |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Founded | 1967 | 2023 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Total Assure?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Total Assure is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Capgemini and Total Assure differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Total Assure supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Total Assure.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Total Assure?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Total Assure pricing: Custom flat-rate pricing. No public dollar amount found.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Total Assure: Confirm exactly which services are inside the flat monthly MDR rate, especially email security, vulnerability management, digital forensics and recovery.; Confirm whether Splunk, SentinelOne, Avanan, Tenable or other third-party tool costs are included or passed through..
Should I choose Capgemini or Total Assure?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Total Assure if: sMBs that want an outsourced security team with U.S.-based 24/7 SOC coverage. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Total Assure is not ideal for enterprises needing published MDR benchmarks and formal public SLA terms before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.