Capgemini vs ThreatSpike
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
ThreatSpike is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Capgemini is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response |
| Price | Custom quote | Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · No approval |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response
- Price
- Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | ThreatSpikePLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | ThreatSpike proprietary EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | Third-party feeds supported, specific SIEM integrations not published |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Fully Autonomous |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateContain |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Published fixed per-user monthly subscription bundling fully managed IT, defensive security and offensive security. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.. The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary.. $135/user/month can be attractive if it replaces IT, MDR and pen testing vendors, but expensive if treated as MDR-only.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit language was found despite the 2 to 5 minute response claim. |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | HospitalityFinancial ServicesManufacturingProfessional ServicesRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | 2 to 5 minute automated incident response/resolve time (vendor-reported) |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | G2 shows 4.9/5 across 32 reviews, with most reviews categorized under Managed Security Services and a mix of SMB, mid-market and enterprise reviewers. Review themes support the consolidation, support and pricing story, but independent analyst coverage appears thinner than larger MDR providers and public review volume is still modest. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusPCI DSS |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusCREST-certified penetration testing providerPCI DSS compliant |
| Founded | 1967 | 2011 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and ThreatSpike?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for ThreatSpike.
How do Capgemini and ThreatSpike differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. ThreatSpike supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to ThreatSpike?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. ThreatSpike pricing: Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with ThreatSpike: ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.; The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary..
Should I choose Capgemini or ThreatSpike?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose ThreatSpike if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want to replace fragmented MSP, MDR and penetration-testing vendors with one fixed-price provider. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. ThreatSpike is not ideal for organizations seeking a narrow MDR overlay on top of an existing mature SOC and tool stack.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.