Capgemini vs TENEX.AI
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Capgemini (Services firm) and TENEX.AI (AI-native MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or TENEX.AI's tenex.ai fits buyers that want an ai-native mdr model with human analyst oversight and are alread....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model |
| Price | Custom quote | $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model
- Price
- $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | TENEX.AITECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Google Security OperationsGoogle Chronicle Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Package pricing by telemetry tier plus custom enterprise quotes. The homepage lists 25TB, 50TB and 100TB MDR packages, but the billing period and overage terms are not stated on the page. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.. No public contractual SLA found.. No public breach warranty found.. Exact response approval rules are not published.. Ticketing integrations, data retention and evidence export details are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmail |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | TechnologyFinancial ServicesBusiness Services |
| MTTD | Not published | AI telemetry analysis within a minute, vendor-reported in third-party coverage |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | TENEX.AI is a young AI-native MDR provider with public funding coverage and partner claims, but independent practitioner review volume is still thin. The main public evidence is official product material, a January 2025 launch announcement and March 2026 funding coverage. |
| Compliance | DORA | – |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | 1967 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and TENEX.AI?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TENEX.AI is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Capgemini and TENEX.AI differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. TENEX.AI supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to TENEX.AI?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. TENEX.AI pricing: Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with TENEX.AI: Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.; No public contractual SLA found..
Should I choose Capgemini or TENEX.AI?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose TENEX.AI if: mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. TENEX.AI is not ideal for buyers who need complete public pricing, including billing period and overage terms, before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.