Capgemini vs Six Degrees
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Six Degrees serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Six Degrees serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Capgemini (Services firm) and Six Degrees (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or Six Degrees's six degrees mdr is strongest for uk organisations that want microsoft-centred mdr delivered from ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | UK public-sector, healthcare, legal, financial-services and regulated organisations that need UK-onshore SOC delivery |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- UK public-sector, healthcare, legal, financial-services and regulated organisations that need UK-onshore SOC delivery
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | Six DegreesTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom quote. Six Degrees does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | The MDR and MXDR pages describe different coverage depth, so buyers should pin down which tier is in the order form.. Microsoft Sentinel data ingestion and retention can materially affect total cost.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. UK-onshore and security-cleared delivery may be valuable for regulated buyers but can make pricing less comparable with lower-cost global MDR providers. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Six Degrees publishes bespoke deployment, configuration and management. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Public SectorCentral GovernmentLocal GovernmentCritical National InfrastructureFinancial ServicesLegalHealthcareRegulated Industries |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Six Degrees has limited MDR-specific community signal. The public buyer case is strongest for UK-onshore delivery, Microsoft security tooling and regulated-sector fit. Treat public claims around containment and response as credible enough for MDR eligibility, but confirm the exact tier, response authority and Microsoft cost model during procurement. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001ISO 9001Cyber Essentials PlusCRESTCHECKCyber SchemeHMG PSNSOC 2 Type IIGDPRPCI DSS |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001ISO 9001Cyber Essentials PlusCRESTCHECKCyber SchemeSOC 2 Type IIMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationMicrosoft Azure Expert MSPMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | 1967 | 2011 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Microsoft Sentinel retention is likely governed by the deployed tenant and contract scope. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Six Degrees?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Capgemini and Six Degrees differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Six Degrees supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Six Degrees.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Six Degrees?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Six Degrees pricing: Not published. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Six Degrees: The MDR and MXDR pages describe different coverage depth, so buyers should pin down which tier is in the order form.; Microsoft Sentinel data ingestion and retention can materially affect total cost..
Should I choose Capgemini or Six Degrees?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Six Degrees if: uK public-sector, healthcare, legal, financial-services and regulated organisations that need UK-onshore SOC delivery. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Six Degrees is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or published response SLAs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.