Capgemini vs SECUINFRA
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Capgemini (Services firm) and SECUINFRA (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or SECUINFRA's fits german and eu buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work insid....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | SECUINFRATECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkElasticIBM QRadar Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom quote, varies by chosen tier (full-service MDR, Co-Managed MDR, On-Premises MDR) and integrated SIEM and EDR. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing. Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response. No published SLA, response timing depends on the underlying SIEM and EDR you bring |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Vendor reports onboarding compressed from 1 week to 1 day for Microsoft-stack customers |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | ManufacturingFinancial ServicesPublic SectorHealthcareEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | SECUINFRA has a Gartner Peer Insights vendor profile in the MDR category but limited English-language community coverage on G2 and PeerSpot. Most public sentiment comes from German-language IT press and the firm's own publishing. Buyers shopping outside Germany should expect to lean on direct references. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001:2013 |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001:2013 (TÜV Thüringen, scope covers Berlin and Frankfurt) |
| Founded | 1967 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and SECUINFRA?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for SECUINFRA.
How do Capgemini and SECUINFRA differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. SECUINFRA supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to SECUINFRA?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. SECUINFRA pricing: Not published. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with SECUINFRA: On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing; Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response.
Should I choose Capgemini or SECUINFRA?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose SECUINFRA if: german SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. SECUINFRA is not ideal for non-European multinationals needing 24/7 follow-the-sun coverage from regional SOCs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.