Capgemini vs Quorum Cyber
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Quorum Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Quorum Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Capgemini (Services firm) and Quorum Cyber (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or Quorum Cyber's the strongest microsoft-native mdr option with a tiered model spanning smb to enterprise, backed ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | Quorum CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Contact for custom quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Not published. Described as 'flexible subscription model' with pricing based on environment size and risk profile. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.. Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably.. Identity coverage (ITDR) and data security (Clarity Data) are separate services at lower tiers. AWS and GCP coverage only available in Clarity Protect (top tier) |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Financial ServicesEducationPublic SectorManufacturingProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR as Representative Vendor (2024, 2025). Microsoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025. First UK Microsoft Verified MXDR provider. Very limited independent review data: no ratings on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights with sufficient reviews. Zero Reddit presence. |
| Compliance | DORA | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 (UKAS-level audit)CREST (Vulnerability Assessment, Pen Testing, CSIR)Cyber EssentialsMicrosoft Verified MXDR SolutionMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025Gartner Market Guide for MDR Representative Vendor (2024, 2025) |
| Founded | 1967 | 2016 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Data resides in customer's own Microsoft Sentinel instance / Azure tenant. Retention governed by customer's Azure configuration. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Quorum Cyber?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Quorum Cyber.
How do Capgemini and Quorum Cyber differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Quorum Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Quorum Cyber.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Quorum Cyber?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Quorum Cyber pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Quorum Cyber: Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.; Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably..
Should I choose Capgemini or Quorum Cyber?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Quorum Cyber if: microsoft-committed organizations (E3/E5) wanting MDR built natively on Sentinel and Defender with data staying in their own Azure tenant. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Quorum Cyber is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or any non-Microsoft primary EDR. Quorum Cyber is Microsoft-only..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.