Capgemini vs Nomios
Capgemini and Nomios are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Nomios serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Nomios (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini and Nomios are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Nomios serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Nomios (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Nomios offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). Capgemini may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | NomiosTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender for EndpointCustomer EDR through Custom MDR |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Nomios Sovereign Managed SIEMSplunkIBM QRadarPalo Alto Networks XSIAM Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Tiered Guardian xMDR pricing and custom pricing for tailored MDR. Public materials state Guardian xMDR has Essential, Core, Advanced and Elite tiers, with scoping starting from endpoint count and expanding by coverage needs. Public price amounts are not listed. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.. Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack.. Coverage outside Cortex XDR's native library may require the Sovereign Managed SIEM extension.. Custom MDR can keep existing tools, but SIEM, EDR and data-retention costs remain part of total cost.. No public breach warranty, trial or fixed response-time SLA was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Subscription, Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published. Guardian xMDR is positioned as structured and fast to deploy; Custom MDR is scoped through direct engagement based on existing tools and required detection engineering. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | HealthcareManufacturingFinancial ServicesGovernmentRetailTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Nomios has a European infrastructure and security-services footprint, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. The clearest public evidence is from Nomios' own MDR page and Guardian xMDR launch material rather than independent managed-service evaluations. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPRNIS2DORA |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 1967 | 2004 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published as a fixed MDR retention period. Nomios states Guardian xMDR customer data is hosted within the EU; retention should be confirmed by tier and SIEM scope. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Nomios?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Nomios is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Nomios.
How do Capgemini and Nomios differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Nomios supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Nomios.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Nomios?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Nomios pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Nomios: Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.; Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack..
Should I choose Capgemini or Nomios?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Nomios if: european buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Nomios is not ideal for buyers that need public per-endpoint price amounts before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.