Capgemini vs Intezer
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Intezer serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Intezer serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Capgemini (Services firm) and Intezer (AI-native MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or Intezer's ai-first approach to soc operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | IntezerTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderPalo Alto Cortex XDR |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkElasticDevoSumo LogicWazuh Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Contact sales for pricing. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Per-endpoint pricing with two tiers: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (unlimited alert sources). Pricing remains fixed regardless of alert volume increases. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M). Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Managed SIEM and premium SLA support are paid add-ons on top of the base subscription. Full incident response not included. You get triage and guided remediation, not hands-on response. CarbonHelix 24/7 SOC is a separate engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalSlack |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North AmericaEurope |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Minutes to connect alert sources via API |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailHospitalityLogistics |
| MTTD | Not published | Sub-minute (median under 60 seconds) |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Users praise the intuitive UI, fast integration and detailed forensic analysis. Limited review volume compared to larger MDR vendors. Main concerns center on pricing transparency and the fact that escalated alerts go to your team, not Intezer analysts. |
| Compliance | DORA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 1967 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Intezer?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Intezer is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Capgemini and Intezer differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Intezer supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Intezer.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Intezer?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Intezer pricing: Not published. Contact sales for pricing.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Intezer: No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M); Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier..
Should I choose Capgemini or Intezer?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Intezer if: teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Intezer is not ideal for organizations requiring traditional human-led MDR with dedicated analysts for every escalation.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.