Capgemini vs DOT Security
Capgemini and DOT Security are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while DOT Security serves SMB and Mid-market. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 1 for DOT Security (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Capgemini and DOT Security are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while DOT Security serves SMB and Mid-market. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 1 for DOT Security (Endpoint).
Capgemini offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). DOT Security may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | DOT SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom quote. No public price bands found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom pricing. DOT does not publish endpoint, user, device or package pricing for MDR. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.. No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Public materials emphasize customized stack design, which can make quotes harder to compare against per-endpoint MDR products.. Specific response actions and approval rules are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | DOT says every relationship begins with a cybersecurity risk audit or gap analysis, followed by stack design, deployment and ongoing management. No standard MDR onboarding timeline was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | HospitalityHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentConstructionFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | DOT Security has a current vendor-controlled MDR signal through its endpoint security page and a clear U.S.-based SOC story. Independent MDR review volume was not found in this pass, so buyer diligence should rely on references, a proof of value and careful quote scoping. |
| Compliance | DORA | HIPAACMMCNISTCCPAGDPR |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | 1967 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and DOT Security?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DOT Security is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for DOT Security.
How do Capgemini and DOT Security differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. DOT Security supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with DOT Security.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to DOT Security?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. DOT Security pricing: Custom quote. No public price bands found.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with DOT Security: DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.; No public response SLA or detection metric was found..
Should I choose Capgemini or DOT Security?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose DOT Security if: sMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. DOT Security is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing, named EDR support or published detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.