Capgemini vs DeepSeas
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; DeepSeas serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for DeepSeas (Endpoint, Cloud, Network, OT/ICS).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; DeepSeas serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for DeepSeas (Endpoint, Cloud, Network, OT/ICS).
Capgemini (Services firm) and DeepSeas (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or DeepSeas's technology-agnostic mdr with ot/ics coverage, which is rare in this market.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | DeepSeasTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneCarbon Black |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage areas. No published pricing. 1-3 year contract terms. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed. Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. OT/ICS coverage may require Nozomi Networks licensing and separate scoping. CyberFusion SOC (dedicated infrastructure) is a separate, premium offering beyond base MDR+ |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual, Multi-year (1-3 years) |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | ManufacturingEnergy & UtilitiesCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Ranked #1 service-based MDR in the 2024 Frost Radar and listed in Gartner's top 40 MDR providers. Praised for OT/ICS coverage and working with existing tools. Very limited practitioner reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Most validation comes from analyst reports rather than user feedback. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001 |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001 (certified December 2024, audited by A-LIGN)Nozomi Networks MSSP Elite PartnerMicrosoft PartnerCrowdStrike Integration Partner |
| Founded | 1967 | 2022 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and DeepSeas?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for DeepSeas.
How do Capgemini and DeepSeas differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. DeepSeas supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with DeepSeas.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to DeepSeas?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. DeepSeas pricing: Not published. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with DeepSeas: Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed; Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR.
Should I choose Capgemini or DeepSeas?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose DeepSeas if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. DeepSeas is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without pre-approved runbooks.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.