Capgemini vs Cyberoo
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Cyberoo serves SMB and Mid-market. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Cyberoo (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Cyberoo serves SMB and Mid-market. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for Cyberoo (Endpoint, Network).
Capgemini (Services firm) and Cyberoo (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or Cyberoo's technology-agnostic mdr from the only italian gartner representative vendor, built for european m....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 4/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Own agent required |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | CyberooTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | Technology-agnostic: integrates with most major EDR platforms |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | Technology-agnostic: integrates with existing SIEM deployments |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom pricing based on environment size and integrated tools. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. SaaS delivery. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.. Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. International expansion is recent (Spain 2024, Poland via partners). Support quality outside Italy may vary.. Detection rules and threat intel are proprietary. If you leave, none of it transfers.. IR is described as included, but scope is not documented. Clarify whether it covers full DFIR or just triage and escalation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | ManufacturingProfessional ServicesTechnologyHealthcareFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (25 reviews). Named Gartner Representative Vendor for MDR in 2021, 2023, and 2024, the only Italian company among 40 vendors in the 2024 guide. Strong reputation in Italian mid-market. Very limited English-language community discussion, likely due to European-centric customer base. |
| Compliance | DORA | GDPR |
| Certifications | – | GDPR Compliant |
| Founded | 1967 | 2019 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Cyberoo?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Cyberoo.
How do Capgemini and Cyberoo differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Cyberoo supports 4 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Cyberoo?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Cyberoo pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Cyberoo: No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.; Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding..
Should I choose Capgemini or Cyberoo?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Cyberoo if: european mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Cyberoo is not ideal for global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage outside Europe.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.