Bridewell vs Wirespeed
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Bridewell targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Bridewell includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Bridewell targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Bridewell includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Bridewell (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Bridewell's strong choice for uk/eu critical national infrastructure needing microsoft-native mdr with ncsc/c... or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations with Microsoft 365 and Azure footprints wanting native Sentinel/Defender XDR managed services | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations with Microsoft 365 and Azure footprints wanting native Sentinel/Defender XDR managed services
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BridewellTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer choice of EDR (integrated via Sentinel) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOnePalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Generic Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsCustom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and Microsoft licensing footprint. Offered via Azure Marketplace as managed service. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR, it is a separate 24/7 service. Requires Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR licensing (customer cost). OT/ICS coverage requires specialist engagement beyond standard MDR. UK/Europe focus, US expansion underway but limited North American SOC presence historically. I-Tracing merger (May 2025) introduces integration risks during transition period | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth America | North America |
| Onboarding | Less than a week for MDR capabilities deployment | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | EnergyUtilitiesTransportAviationGovernmentFinancial ServicesCritical National Infrastructure (CNI) | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Limited public reviews due to CNI/government client base where testimonials are restricted. Published case studies from Northern Gas Networks and Manchester Airport Group praise technical depth and organized delivery. No G2/Gartner Peer Insights presence and zero Reddit mentions suggest limited visibility outside UK CNI and public sector markets. Hard to assess independently. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 9001ISO 22301Cyber Essentials PlusCREST SOCCREST CSIRNCSC AssuredISA/IEC 62443GDPRPCI DSS | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 9001ISO 22301Cyber Essentials PlusCREST SOC (SOC accreditation)CREST CSIR (Cyber Security Incident Response)CREST Intelligence-led Penetration TestingCREST Penetration TestingCREST Vulnerability AssessmentCREST Incident ExercisingNCSC CHECK (penetration testing)NCSC CIR (Cyber Incident Response, Standard Level)NCSC CIE (Cyber Incident Exercising)NCSC Cyber Resilience AuditNCSC Risk Management ConsultancyNCSC Audit and ReviewNCSC Security Architecture ConsultancyMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security (Cloud Security and Threat Protection specialisms)Microsoft Verified Managed XDR Solution | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2013 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. Determined by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace retention settings and contract terms. | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Bridewell and Wirespeed?
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Bridewell covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do Bridewell and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
Bridewell supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Bridewell pricing compare to Wirespeed?
Bridewell pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with Bridewell: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR, it is a separate 24/7 service; Requires Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR licensing (customer cost). Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose Bridewell or Wirespeed?
Choose Bridewell if: uK and European Critical National Infrastructure organizations (energy, transport, utilities, government) needing NCSC/CREST-assured MDR. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. Bridewell is not ideal for organizations requiring multi-vendor, platform-agnostic MDR beyond the Microsoft ecosystem. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.