Bridewell vs Capgemini
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Bridewell targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Capgemini serves Enterprise. Bridewell includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Capgemini (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Bridewell targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Capgemini serves Enterprise. Bridewell includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Capgemini (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Bridewell (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Capgemini (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Bridewell's strong choice for uk/eu critical national infrastructure needing microsoft-native mdr with ncsc/c... or Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations with Microsoft 365 and Azure footprints wanting native Sentinel/Defender XDR managed services | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations with Microsoft 365 and Azure footprints wanting native Sentinel/Defender XDR managed services
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BridewellTECH-AGNOSTIC | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCustomer choice of EDR (integrated via Sentinel) | Customer endpoint security tools |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsCustom playbooks | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and Microsoft licensing footprint. Offered via Azure Marketplace as managed service. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR, it is a separate 24/7 service. Requires Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR licensing (customer cost). OT/ICS coverage requires specialist engagement beyond standard MDR. UK/Europe focus, US expansion underway but limited North American SOC presence historically. I-Tracing merger (May 2025) introduces integration risks during transition period | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPortalPhoneTeams |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth America | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA |
| Onboarding | Less than a week for MDR capabilities deployment | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. |
| Industry focus | EnergyUtilitiesTransportAviationGovernmentFinancial ServicesCritical National Infrastructure (CNI) | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Limited public reviews due to CNI/government client base where testimonials are restricted. Published case studies from Northern Gas Networks and Manchester Airport Group praise technical depth and organized delivery. No G2/Gartner Peer Insights presence and zero Reddit mentions suggest limited visibility outside UK CNI and public sector markets. Hard to assess independently. | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 9001ISO 22301Cyber Essentials PlusCREST SOCCREST CSIRNCSC AssuredISA/IEC 62443GDPRPCI DSS | DORA |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 9001ISO 22301Cyber Essentials PlusCREST SOC (SOC accreditation)CREST CSIR (Cyber Security Incident Response)CREST Intelligence-led Penetration TestingCREST Penetration TestingCREST Vulnerability AssessmentCREST Incident ExercisingNCSC CHECK (penetration testing)NCSC CIR (Cyber Incident Response, Standard Level)NCSC CIE (Cyber Incident Exercising)NCSC Cyber Resilience AuditNCSC Risk Management ConsultancyNCSC Audit and ReviewNCSC Security Architecture ConsultancyMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security (Cloud Security and Threat Protection specialisms)Microsoft Verified Managed XDR Solution | – |
| Founded | 2013 | 1967 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. Determined by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace retention settings and contract terms. | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Bridewell and Capgemini?
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Bridewell covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Capgemini.
How do Bridewell and Capgemini differ in response capabilities?
Bridewell supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Bridewell and included with Capgemini.
How does Bridewell pricing compare to Capgemini?
Bridewell pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Capgemini pricing: Not published. Watch for with Bridewell: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR, it is a separate 24/7 service; Requires Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR licensing (customer cost). Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA..
Should I choose Bridewell or Capgemini?
Choose Bridewell if: uK and European Critical National Infrastructure organizations (energy, transport, utilities, government) needing NCSC/CREST-assured MDR. Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Bridewell is not ideal for organizations requiring multi-vendor, platform-agnostic MDR beyond the Microsoft ecosystem. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.