Barracuda Networks vs glueckkanja: MDR Comparison 2026
Barracuda Networks (MSP-channel) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Barracuda Networks works with your existing tools, while glueckkanja requires its own security platform. Barracuda Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; glueckkanja focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Barracuda Networks includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for glueckkanja (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Barracuda Networks vs glueckkanja: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Barracuda Networks if:
- •MSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients
- •SMBs that don't have a security team and want turnkey coverage
- •Organizations using Microsoft 365 and needing email + endpoint coverage
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Barracuda Networks is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Barracuda Networks and glueckkanja?
Barracuda Networks is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Barracuda Networks offers ≤1 hour, glueckkanja offers Not disclosed. Barracuda Networks covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for glueckkanja.
How do Barracuda Networks and glueckkanja differ in response capabilities?
Barracuda Networks supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Barracuda Networks pricing compare to glueckkanja?
Barracuda Networks pricing: ~$14.50/endpoint/year (3-year endpoint); ~$8–$20/user/month depending on coverage scope. Minimum 25 licenses. (25-seat minimum). glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Barracuda Networks: Security logs not available for download — limits forensic independence; MSP-focused pricing may differ from direct enterprise pricing. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing.
Should I choose Barracuda Networks or glueckkanja?
Choose Barracuda Networks if: mSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients. Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Barracuda Networks is not ideal for enterprises wanting full data access and log export capabilities. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence.