Avertium vs InfoGuard
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Avertium (Pure-play MDR) and InfoGuard (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Avertium's technology-agnostic mdr with deep microsoft, logrhythm, and sentinelone expertise or InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AvertiumTECH-AGNOSTIC | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelLogRhythm NextGen SIEM | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage scope (endpoints, cloud, users), and platform choice. Annual subscription. | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own. Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). No published pricing, requires custom quote for accurate cost comparison. Platform choice (Microsoft vs LogRhythm vs SentinelOne) significantly impacts total cost due to differing license models. Full DFIR (digital forensics and incident response) is a separate retainer or on-demand engagement, not included in base Fusion MXDR | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Varies by platform and environment size. | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailHospitalityPublic Sector | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (89 reviews for managed security services). Customers praise knowledgeable staff and flexible, tailored service. Limited public reviews compared to larger MDR providers. Glassdoor 4.4/5 (68 reviews), with 84% recommending to a friend. Minimal Reddit or G2 presence, making independent validation harder. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | HIPAA (consulting services for customer compliance)PCI DSS (consulting services for customer compliance)NIST (consulting services for customer compliance)HITRUST (consulting services for customer compliance) | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified MXDR Solution Status (April 2025)Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA) memberMicrosoft Security Excellence Award 2026 winner, Security Trailblazer category (January 2026) | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2019 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by underlying platform (Microsoft, LogRhythm, SentinelOne) | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Avertium and InfoGuard?
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Avertium covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for InfoGuard.
How do Avertium and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
Avertium supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Avertium and included with InfoGuard.
How does Avertium pricing compare to InfoGuard?
Avertium pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with Avertium: Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own; Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose Avertium or InfoGuard?
Choose Avertium if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already committed to Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne wanting managed SOC services. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Avertium is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations needing transparent, published pricing and lower minimums. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.