At-Bay Stance MDR vs InfoGuard
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; InfoGuard serves Mid-market and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for InfoGuard (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
At-Bay Stance MDR is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. InfoGuard is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · No approval | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | At-Bay Stance MDRPLATFORM | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Fully Autonomous | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContain | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Packages page offers an estimated MDR cost flow and ties MDR to insurance package enhancements, but no public fixed price bands were found. | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.. Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found despite under-15-minute containment claims.. Specific EDR/email/cloud technologies and data export options should be confirmed in writing. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | PortalEmail | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard timeline. Customer testimonials say onboarding was quick and did not require complex setup or internal playbooks. | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. |
| Industry focus | Cyber InsuranceProfessional ServicesTechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetail | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes from detection to containment on average (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | At-Bay has strong first-party customer testimonials on MDR pages, but little independent public MDR review signal was found in this pass. The market story is current and differentiated through InsurSec, SentinelOne partnership, claims data, and MSP channel materials, but buyer validation should rely on references until more third-party MDR reviews accumulate. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member |
| Founded | 2016 | 2001 |
| Data retention | Not published. Trust page states data is processed and stored exclusively in AWS data centers in the United States. | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between At-Bay Stance MDR and InfoGuard?
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). At-Bay Stance MDR covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for InfoGuard.
How do At-Bay Stance MDR and InfoGuard differ in response capabilities?
At-Bay Stance MDR supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with At-Bay Stance MDR and included with InfoGuard.
How does At-Bay Stance MDR pricing compare to InfoGuard?
At-Bay Stance MDR pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Watch for with At-Bay Stance MDR: Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.; Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract..
Should I choose At-Bay Stance MDR or InfoGuard?
Choose At-Bay Stance MDR if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage. Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. At-Bay Stance MDR is not ideal for large enterprises needing published global SOC locations, formal SLA tables and mature third-party analyst validation. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.