At-Bay Stance MDR vs Capgemini
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Capgemini serves Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for Capgemini (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Capgemini serves Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for Capgemini (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
At-Bay Stance MDR is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Capgemini is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · No approval | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | At-Bay Stance MDRPLATFORM | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOne | Customer endpoint security tools |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Fully Autonomous | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContain | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Packages page offers an estimated MDR cost flow and ties MDR to insurance package enhancements, but no public fixed price bands were found. | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.. Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found despite under-15-minute containment claims.. Specific EDR/email/cloud technologies and data export options should be confirmed in writing. | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement |
| Channels | PortalEmail | EmailPortalPhoneTeams |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard timeline. Customer testimonials say onboarding was quick and did not require complex setup or internal playbooks. | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. |
| Industry focus | Cyber InsuranceProfessional ServicesTechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetail | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes from detection to containment on average (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | At-Bay has strong first-party customer testimonials on MDR pages, but little independent public MDR review signal was found in this pass. The market story is current and differentiated through InsurSec, SentinelOne partnership, claims data, and MSP channel materials, but buyer validation should rely on references until more third-party MDR reviews accumulate. | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | DORA |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | – |
| Founded | 2016 | 1967 |
| Data retention | Not published. Trust page states data is processed and stored exclusively in AWS data centers in the United States. | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between At-Bay Stance MDR and Capgemini?
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). At-Bay Stance MDR covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Capgemini.
How do At-Bay Stance MDR and Capgemini differ in response capabilities?
At-Bay Stance MDR supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with At-Bay Stance MDR and included with Capgemini.
How does At-Bay Stance MDR pricing compare to Capgemini?
At-Bay Stance MDR pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Capgemini pricing: Not published. Watch for with At-Bay Stance MDR: Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.; Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA..
Should I choose At-Bay Stance MDR or Capgemini?
Choose At-Bay Stance MDR if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage. Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. At-Bay Stance MDR is not ideal for large enterprises needing published global SOC locations, formal SLA tables and mature third-party analyst validation. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.