N-able vs Check Point: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of N-able and Check Point managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Check Point
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
N-able
More integration options
Criteria
Unified security operations platform combining XDR, SIEM, SOAR, and UEBA with MDR in one solution. AI automates 70% of threat response. Breach warranty and vendor-agnostic approach make it compelling for MSPs serving SMB/mid-market clients.
Enterprise-grade MDR backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ security experts, with an industry-leading 160+ integrations for vendor-neutral coverage. Best for organizations wanting comprehensive coverage across all attack surfaces from a vendor with deep network security heritage.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✓
✓
Kill Process
✓
✓
IR Included
✓ Included
✓ Included
Response SLA
Not disclosed
≤30 minutes
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
EmailPortalPhone
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
Dashboards
Dashboards
Model
Per-user per-month (tiered packages: MDR Base, MDR Complete, MDR Plus)
Subscription-based with one-year and multi-year plans; per-user or deployment size based; three tiers (MDR, MDR 360, MXDR 360)
Price Range
MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR
Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.
Minimum Seats
None
None
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
✓ Included
Overall
Positive
Mixed
Summary
Positive reception in MSP community following N-able acquisition. Users praise comprehensive features, compliance reporting, and AI automation. Some concerns about pricing relative to competitors and platform complexity for smaller MSPs.
Valued by large enterprises already in the Check Point ecosystem as a powerful security partner. Strong detection capabilities backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ experts. However, perceived as expensive, with licensing complexity and limited appeal outside the existing Check Point customer base.
N-able vs Check Point: Which Should You Choose?
Choose N-able if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market
Choose Check Point if:
- You need active remediation
- ≤30 minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between N-able and Check Point?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (Not disclosed vs ≤30 minutes), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).