Mandiant vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
Mandiant (Services firm) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Mandiant works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. Mandiant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Mandiant includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Mandiant vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Mandiant is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Mandiant and ThreatDown?
Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Mandiant covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Mandiant and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Mandiant pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Mandiant or ThreatDown?
Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).