Kroll vs Todyl: MDR Comparison 2026
Kroll and Todyl are both categorized as MDR providers, but differ in execution. Kroll works with your existing tools and targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations. Todyl requires its own security platform and focuses on SMB and Mid-market.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Kroll vs Todyl: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Todyl does not)
Choose Todyl if:
- •MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management
- •SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated security contact (DRAM) at an accessible price point
- •Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Todyl is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Kroll is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Kroll and Todyl?
Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Todyl is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack).
How do Kroll and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Kroll and not included with Todyl.
How does Kroll pricing compare to Todyl?
Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in -- must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base -- unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose Kroll or Todyl?
Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility). Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments -- requires full Todyl stack adoption.