Kroll vs ReliaQuest: MDR Comparison 2026
Kroll (MDR provider) and ReliaQuest (Pure-play MDR) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Kroll works with your existing tools, while ReliaQuest works with your existing tools. Kroll targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; ReliaQuest focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Kroll includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for ReliaQuest (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Kroll vs ReliaQuest: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, ReliaQuest does not)
Choose ReliaQuest if:
- •Large enterprises with complex multi-vendor security stacks
- •Organizations wanting to keep existing SIEM/EDR investments
- •Security teams needing AI-driven automation at scale
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Kroll (MDR provider) and ReliaQuest (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves... or ReliaQuest's strong fit for enterprises wanting to unify and automate across their existing multi-vendor secur....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Kroll and ReliaQuest?
Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ReliaQuest is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Kroll offers Not disclosed, ReliaQuest offers ≤15 minutes. Kroll covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for ReliaQuest.
How do Kroll and ReliaQuest differ in response capabilities?
Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ReliaQuest supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Kroll pricing compare to ReliaQuest?
Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. ReliaQuest pricing: $172,500 average annual; up to $1,200,000 for large deployments. $5,000 per additional integrated technology.. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed. Watch for with ReliaQuest: High minimum contract value (enterprise-focused); Additional technology integrations add cost quickly.
Should I choose Kroll or ReliaQuest?
Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. Choose ReliaQuest if: large enterprises with complex multi-vendor security stacks. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility). ReliaQuest is not ideal for sMBs with limited security budgets.