Kroll vs Rapid7: MDR Comparison 2026

Kroll (MDR provider) and Rapid7 (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Kroll works with your existing tools, while Rapid7 requires its own security platform. Kroll targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Rapid7 focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.

Key Differences at a Glance

Business Model

Kroll: MDR provider

Rapid7: EDR vendor

Approach

Kroll: Works with your tools

Rapid7: Requires their platform

Autonomous Actions

Kroll: 6/6 (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment...)

Rapid7: 6/6 (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment...)

Attack Surfaces Included

Kroll: 5/6 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network)

Rapid7: 5/6 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network)

Pricing

Kroll: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.

Rapid7: Starting ~$17/asset/month; $30,000-$150,000+/year for enterprise deployments

Vendor Lock-in

Kroll: No proprietary agent

Rapid7: Requires own agent

Data Access

Kroll: Dashboard access

Rapid7: Full query access

Winner by Category

Response Level

Tie

Same level

SLA Speed

Tie

Same speed

Coverage Breadth

Tie

Same coverage

Integrations

Tie

Similar breadth

Criteria

Kroll

Kroll Responder's differentiator is depth of real-world IR experience: 3,000+ annual breach investigations feeding detection and response. This is a services firm with MDR, not an MDR vendor with services. Complete Response methodology, included $1M breach warranty, and direct escalation to elite IR/forensics teams set it apart. December 2025 CrowdStrike migration brings faster response but increases platform dependency.

Rapid7

Unique combination of full SIEM data access with managed MDR, providing both transparency and active response. Analyst pod model ensures your SOC team knows your environment. AI triage accuracy and Active Remediation via Velociraptor are standout features.

Provider Model

Works with your tools

Requires their platform

Requires Own Agent

No — works with your EDR

Yes — platform-native

Response Type

Active Remediation

Approval Policy

Configurable

Auto-Isolate

✓

Kill Process

✓

IR Included

✓ Included

Response SLA

Not disclosed

24/7 Coverage

✓ Yes

Channels

EmailPortalPhone

SlackEmailPortalPhone

Data Access

Dashboards

Full Query

Model

Custom quote-based pricing; not publicly disclosed

Per-asset monthly pricing; three tiers (Essentials, Advanced, Ultimate)

Price Range

Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.

Starting ~$17/asset/month; $30,000-$150,000+/year for enterprise deployments

Minimum Seats

None

Threat Hunting

✓ Included

Overall

Positive

Summary

Trusted for deep IR pedigree and Complete Response methodology. Kroll self-reports 98% customer satisfaction and 75 NPS (2024 internal survey, not independently verified). Lower market visibility than pure-play MDR brands (~0.4% PeerSpot mindshare, ranking fluctuates #36-43). December 2025 CrowdStrike migration generates mixed reactions around vendor lock-in.

Strong ratings with praise for transparency, data access, and the analyst pod model. Valued for providing full SIEM access alongside MDR. Pricing is higher than some competitors but justified by feature depth.

Kroll vs Rapid7: Which Should You Choose?

Choose Kroll if:

•Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
•Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
•Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty

Choose Rapid7 if:

•Mid-market to enterprise organizations wanting full data transparency alongside MDR
•Security teams that want to retain query access to their own data
•Organizations needing active remediation without a fully outsourced model
•You want direct Slack integration with your SOC

Bottom line: Rapid7 is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Kroll is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Kroll and Rapid7?

Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Rapid7 is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack).

How do Kroll and Rapid7 differ in response capabilities?

Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Rapid7 supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.

How does Kroll pricing compare to Rapid7?

Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Rapid7 pricing: Starting ~$17/asset/month; $30,000-$150,000+/year for enterprise deployments. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed. Watch for with Rapid7: Requires Rapid7 Insight Agent on at least 80% of supported assets; Enterprise tier significantly more expensive than Essentials.

Should I choose Kroll or Rapid7?

Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. Choose Rapid7 if: mid-market to enterprise organizations wanting full data transparency alongside MDR. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility). Rapid7 is not ideal for small organizations with fewer than 100 assets seeking budget MDR.

View Kroll full profile →View Rapid7 full profile →

Kroll vs Rapid7: MDR Comparison 2026

Key Differences at a Glance

Business Model

Kroll: MDR provider

Rapid7: EDR vendor

Approach

Kroll: Works with your tools

Rapid7: Requires their platform

Autonomous Actions

Kroll: 6/6 (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment...)

Rapid7: 6/6 (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment...)

Attack Surfaces Included

Kroll: 5/6 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network)

Rapid7: 5/6 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network)

Pricing

Kroll: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.

Rapid7: Starting ~$17/asset/month; $30,000-$150,000+/year for enterprise deployments

Vendor Lock-in

Kroll: No proprietary agent

Rapid7: Requires own agent

Data Access

Kroll: Dashboard access

Rapid7: Full query access

Kroll vs Rapid7: Which Should You Choose?

Choose Kroll if:

•Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
•Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
•Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty

Choose Rapid7 if:

•Mid-market to enterprise organizations wanting full data transparency alongside MDR
•Security teams that want to retain query access to their own data
•Organizations needing active remediation without a fully outsourced model
•You want direct Slack integration with your SOC

Bottom line: Rapid7 is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Kroll is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Kroll and Rapid7?

Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Rapid7 is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack).