Huntress vs Kroll: MDR Comparison 2026
Huntress (MSP-channel) and Kroll (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Huntress requires its own security platform, while Kroll works with your existing tools. Huntress targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Kroll focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Huntress includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Huntress vs Kroll: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Huntress does not)
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Kroll is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and Kroll?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kroll.
How do Huntress and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Huntress and included with Kroll.
How does Huntress pricing compare to Kroll?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose Huntress or Kroll?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).