Huntress vs Binary Defense: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Huntress and Binary Defense managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Tie
Same speed
Coverage Breadth
Binary Defense
5 vs 3 surfaces
Integrations
Binary Defense
More integration options
Criteria
Binary Defense stands out for its Open XDR approach that works with your existing stack rather than replacing it. The attacker's mindset-driven threat hunting, AI-powered managed deception, and strong data portability philosophy make it ideal for security-mature organizations that want deep technical partnership without vendor lock-in.
Response Type
Guided Response
Guided Response
Approval Policy
N/A
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✗
✓
Kill Process
✗
✓
IR Included
Separate
Separate
Response SLA
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
N/A
SlackEmailPortalPhone
Data Access
N/A
Full Query
Model
Not published
Custom pricing; MDR and MDR Plus tiers available
Price Range
Not published
Not published
Minimum Seats
N/A
None
Threat Hunting
N/A
✓ Included
Overall
N/A
Mixed
Summary
N/A
Strong Performer in Forrester Wave with highest scores in Endpoint Detection, Threat Hunting, and Community. Praised for human-driven approach and Open XDR flexibility. Some recent reviews report declining service quality and value concerns.
Huntress vs Binary Defense: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- You need guided response
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB
Choose Binary Defense if:
- You need guided response
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Huntress and Binary Defense?
Key differences: response model (Guided Response vs Guided Response), SLA (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).