glueckkanja vs Mandiant: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Mandiant (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while Mandiant works with your existing tools. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Mandiant focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 5 for Mandiant (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs Mandiant: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Mandiant is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and Mandiant?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Mandiant.
How do glueckkanja and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with glueckkanja and not included with Mandiant.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to Mandiant?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose glueckkanja or Mandiant?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing.