glueckkanja vs Kroll: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Kroll (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while Kroll works with your existing tools. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kroll focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 5 for Kroll (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs Kroll: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, glueckkanja does not)
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Kroll is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and Kroll?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kroll.
How do glueckkanja and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to Kroll?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose glueckkanja or Kroll?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).