Field Effect vs glueckkanja: MDR Comparison 2026
Field Effect (MDR provider) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Field Effect requires its own security platform, while glueckkanja requires its own security platform. Field Effect targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; glueckkanja focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Field Effect includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 6 for glueckkanja (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Field Effect vs glueckkanja: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Field Effect if:
- •SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing
- •Canadian organizations needing domestic data hosting and PIPEDA compliance
- •Healthcare, government, and defense contractors needing HIPAA/CMMC/NIST compliance support
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: Field Effect (MDR provider) and glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Field Effect's mitre-validated detection (11-min mttd, detected every measured step) with vendor-claimed 99.9% n... or glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Field Effect and glueckkanja?
Field Effect is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Field Effect covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 6 for glueckkanja.
How do Field Effect and glueckkanja differ in response capabilities?
Field Effect supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Field Effect and included with glueckkanja.
How does Field Effect pricing compare to glueckkanja?
Field Effect pricing: MDR Core: $99/user/month (ideal for <=25 users). MDR Complete: custom pricing (larger organizations, compliance requirements).. glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Field Effect: MDR Core excludes network monitoring, DNS firewall, and dark web monitoring — significant feature gap vs Complete; $99/user adds up quickly — 50 users = $4,950/month. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing.
Should I choose Field Effect or glueckkanja?
Choose Field Effect if: sMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing. Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Field Effect is not ideal for organizations with existing CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender deployments — requires proprietary Field Effect agent. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence.